Time in Czech Republic right now

IN JANUARY 2015, after 17 men and women passed away in a number of situations in Paris—including an assault on Charlie Hebdo, a satirical newspaper—Europe erupted in spontaneous demonstrations. Men and women marched in protest against an assault on significant concept of European civilisation: freedom of appearance. Hundreds of thousands ended up for rallies throughout the continent, toting signs bearing the message “Je suis Charlie” in recognition with those killed during the report, which caricatured the Prophet Muhammad. Numerous cautioned against letting the assaults turn community sentiment against Muslims overall, whether immigrant or native-born. In Germany the reaction of Horst Seehofer, the chairman regarding the CSU (the Bavarian sibling party of Germany's regulating Christian Democrats), had been typical. Doubting any backlinks between terrorism and immigration policies, he called on Germany’s anti-Islam Pegida motion to cancel a well planned demonstration, and said he had been pleased that most German events had “refrained from deriving political capital from attack.”

After Friday night of assaults in Paris, but which is why Islamic State (IS) has actually claimed obligation, Mr Seehofer took a rather different line. The jihadists’ assaults illustrated the need for “stronger control over Europe's external boundaries, additionally of nationwide boundaries, ” he said; it absolutely was a matter of “restoring legislation and purchase in Europe.” Bavaria’s finance minister, Markus Söder, also of the CSU, agreed: “Paris modifications everything” he declared, adding that the assaults designed the termination of “the time of out of control immigration”. Within hours of assaults, CSU leaders had been exploiting them as an element of their particular effort to undercut Chancellor Angela Merkel and force the lady to slow the influx of migrants from center East.

The contrast was informing. When you look at the aftermath of Friday’s attacks, which killed at least 129 men and women in areas around Paris, European frontrunners once again issued statements of sympathy and outrage, while their residents turned out en masse with flowers and candle lights to demonstrate solidarity. But in which the “Je suis Charlie” demonstrators resisted linking terrorism to immigration or Islam, the mood this time was even more ambivalent. By targeting a well-known hit socket and a Jewish grocery store, the Charlie Hebdo killers permitted Europeans to frame their outrage around good ideals: freedom of speech and of religion. However the latest attacks seemed to hit general public spaces at random—a Cambodian restaurant, a football stadium, a concert hallway. Plus some Europeans undoubtedly began connecting the physical violence into the concern with dominated their politics the previous 6 months: the revolution of refugees online streaming in their continent through the Middle East.

Je suis Charlie 2? Pas exactement
The most explicit linkage came in Poland, where right-wing legislation and Justice (PiS) celebration won a landslide election triumph in October, assisted in part by concern with migrants. In a hasty op-ed on Saturday early morning, the incoming PiS minister for European affairs, Konrad Szymanski, penned that after the Paris assaults he saw “no governmental possibility” of implementing the European Union’s brand-new plan to redistribute asylum people among user says. “Poland must keep complete control of its boundaries, asylum and immigration plan, ” Mr Szymanski had written.